Choosing the best drones for farm mapping comes down to one question: what do you need the map to prove? If you are certifying acreage for crop insurance or planning drainage, you need centimeter-accurate positioning. If you are chasing early disease in a stand of corn, you need multispectral bands. If you are counting heat signatures off livestock or checking irrigation pivots, you need a thermal sensor.
Most consumer camera drones cannot do any of that well. They fly, they film, and they produce beautiful RGB images that bend and distort across a field boundary. Mapping platforms are a different category of machine, and the gap between them shows up in the first orthomosaic you try to build.
We went through the current mapping-capable platforms that carry customer feedback, compared their positioning, payloads, endurance and weather handling, and sorted them by the job each one actually does. Our picks below cover small acreage scouting, mid-size block mapping, thermal inspection and whole-farm survey lines, updated for 2026.
Table of Contents
Top 3 Picks for Farm Mapping in October 2026
The three below cover the widest range of real farm jobs. The Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3 is the one we would buy first, because built-in RTK plus a 1-inch sensor is the pairing that produces survey-grade output without a second purchase. The EVO II Dual 640T is the thermal specialist, and the EVO Lite 640T is the packable one for scouts who walk their fields on foot.
Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3
- Built-in centimeter-level RTK
- 1-inch 6K HDR camera
- 38-minute flight time
- 15 km transmission
Autel EVO II Dual 640T Enterprise V3
- 640x512 thermal sensor
- 42-minute endurance
- 15 km SkyLink 2.0
- Spot and isotherm modes
Autel EVO Lite 640T Enterprise
- 866 g backpack weight
- Thermal plus 48 MP visible
- 40-minute flight
- 12 km transmission
All 6 Best Drones for Farm Mapping Compared in October 2026
This table puts every platform side by side so you can match airframe design to field size. Note the split: the three multirotors are the ones that can hover and hold position, while the fixed-wing VTOL trades that for range.
| Product | Specifications | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3 |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Autel EVO II Dual 640T Enterprise V3 |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Autel EVO Lite 640T Enterprise |
|
Check Latest Price |
 DJI Mavic 3M |
|
Check Latest Price |
 ROC WING VTOL Y3 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 DJI Matrice 4TD |
|
Check Latest Price |
1. Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3 Review: The Most Complete Mapping Rig in the Set
Autel Robotics EVO II PRO RTK V3 w/Real-time Centimeter-Level Positioning
RTK accuracy 1 cm + 1 ppm
1-inch 6K HDR camera
38 min flight
15 km link
Pros
- Centimeter-level RTK built into the airframe
- Excellent stability in heavy wind
- Long battery life on larger blocks
- 6K camera with RAW support for photogrammetry
- Spare batteries and multi-charger in the bundle
Cons
- Autel app interface is not intuitive
- Limited official documentation for RTK workflows
- RAW and RTK workflow has a learning curve
- Some reviewers report oversaturated stills
This is the platform we keep coming back to, because the RTK module is not an add-on. The current RTK module delivers 1 cm + 1 ppm horizontal and 1.5 cm + 1 ppm vertical accuracy in real time, which means your waypoint photos carry trustworthy coordinates the moment they land. On a farm that is the difference between a map you can hand to an agronomist and one you can only look at.
It also supports an RTK base station and an RTK network, plus PPK with time synchronization so you can still finish a job when the correction signal drops mid-field. That fallback matters more than most spec sheets admit. A grower on r/UAVmapping will tell you the base station setup is the part that wrecks an afternoon, and having PPK as a safety net softens that risk.
The camera is the other reason it ranks first here. A 1-inch CMOS sensor shooting 6K at 30fps with HDR, plus RAW stills, gives photogrammetric software enough detail to separate canopy gaps from healthy leaf. Reviewers consistently single out the wind tolerance and the long battery life as the practical wins, and the control link is described as strong and consistent compared with other drones in the same class.
Mission planning runs through waypoint, rectangle, polygon and oblique photography tasks with repeatable shooting positions. The 360-degree obstacle avoidance is not a mapping feature, but on a farm full of power poles, tree lines and grain bins it is the difference between a clean return and a cracked arm.
One practical detail worth knowing: Autel Mapper needs a Windows 10 or 11 64-bit machine with an NVIDIA GPU at compute power 3.0 or higher. Budget for a capable laptop before the aircraft, not after. The bundle also works with Carlson PhotoCapture and Carlson Point Cloud if you want to push surfaces and CAD plans out of the same dataset.
What holds up after real fieldwork
The controller screen is large and bright enough to read in direct sun, which sounds minor until you are squinting at a mission waypoint map at noon in August. Buyers also note that batteries, spare propellers and multiple chargers arrive in the box, so you are not waiting on a second delivery before your second flight.
Output quality is where it separates from cheaper builds. Mapping users report working orthomosaics and 3D models once firmware is updated, and the 15 km transmission range means you rarely lose link across a long field boundary. For a farm that maps regularly, that reliability is what turns a hobby purchase into a tool.
Where it frustrates operators
The Autel app is the most common complaint. Settings layout is not intuitive, and the official documentation and tutorials for advanced RTK workflows are thin compared with what DJI users expect. If you are moving from a DJI system, plan a few evening flights on a small field before you point it at a 400-acre block.
Support is the second soft spot. A minority of reviews describe serious post-sale problems after a hardware failure, which is worth weighing if you are buying far from any dealer. Some reviewers also report oversaturated colors in stills, a cosmetic issue that does not affect the structural output but will bother you if you plan to use the RGB layer for visual assessment alongside the index layers.
2. Autel EVO II Dual 640T Enterprise V3 Review: Thermal Work With Real Endurance
Autel Robotics EVO II Dual 640T Enterprise V3, 640 * 512 T~hermal Imaging
640x512 thermal at 30 fps
42 min flight time
15 km SkyLink 2.0
7.9-inch controller
Pros
- Thermal payload gives usable radiometric temperature data
- 42-minute endurance suits large survey blocks
- Bright 7.9-inch touchscreen readable in the field
- Modular accessories expand the mission profile
Cons
- RTK positioning module not included in this bundle
- 640x512 is the lowest-resolution thermal option in this class
- Advanced feature set carries a learning curve
This is the airframe to look at when your mapping problem is heat rather than color. Owners rate it highly for imaging quality, endurance and transmission reliability, and they single out the isotherm and spot measurement modes as the features that make it useful beyond a visual once-over.
The thermal sensor records 640×512 at 30 fps through a 13 mm lens with 16x digital zoom, and the temperature analysis modes include spot, regional, center, temperature alarm, isotherm and image enhancement. For irrigation work that means you can flag the pivot section running hot and then confirm it against the visible sensor. Livestock heat-stress scouting works the same way.
Endurance is the standout number. Carbon fiber arms and larger propellers give 42 minutes of flight, and SkyLink 2.0 carries 15 km on 2.4GHz, 5.8GHz and 900MHz with automatic frequency switching. That tri-band behavior matters in country terrain where a single frequency gets crowded.
What holds up after real fieldwork
The 7.9-inch V3 smart controller touchscreen runs at four times the brightness of an ordinary mobile device. On a bright day that is a genuine working difference, because most of your time at the aircraft is spent reading a map rather than aiming a camera.
Accessories are modular. A strobe, spotlight, loudspeaker and beacon bolt on as needed, which lets you expand the mission profile over time instead of committing everything at purchase. Operating temperature runs from -10 to 40 degrees C, wide enough for early spring and late fall work in most climates. The bundle ships with the aircraft, camera, gimbal, remote controller, battery, charger and multi-charger, so the field kit is complete for first launch.
Where it frustrates operators
The RTK module is not included in this bundle and must be added separately. That is the single biggest planning point for anyone buying this for mapping rather than inspection, and it is the reason this airframe sits second rather than first. Budget for it before the aircraft leaves the truck.
Thermal resolution of 640×512 is modest next to higher-resolution radiometric payloads, so fine-detail work on individual plants is out of reach. The advanced feature set also has a steeper learning curve than the airframe’s size suggests. If you have never flown an enterprise platform, the manual-and-test-field routine is not optional.
3. Autel EVO Lite 640T Enterprise Review: The Backpack Scout
Autel Robotics EVO Lite 640T Enterprise Bundle, 866g Lightweight
866 g foldable airframe
640x512 thermal plus 48 MP
40 min flight
12 km SkyLink 2.0
Pros
- Very low 866 g weight for in-crop launch and landing
- Thermal and 48 MP visible payload in one compact unit
- -20 to 550 degrees C range with 16x zoom
- Simple single-pilot deployment
- Spare batteries and extra propellers included
Cons
- Small 640x512 thermal resolution limits fine radiometric work
- Less wind tolerant than larger enterprise airframes
- Limited long-term field feedback at this listing
- AI target recognition is built for surveillance not crop analytics
Everything about this airframe is shaped by one number: 866 g. That is a backpackable weight, and it changes where you can fly. You can launch and land in-crop, walk to a pivot without a truck, and cover scattered small fields in a single afternoon without a vehicle reset between them.
The payload pairs a 640×512 thermal sensor at 30 Hz on a 9 mm lens with 16x digital zoom, covering -20 to 550 degrees C at plus or minus 3 degrees C accuracy, alongside a 1/2-inch 48 MP visible CMOS sensor. Buyers value that combination for rapid in-field scouting, and the wide temperature range with zoom is what lets you spot heat anomalies at distance rather than walking the row.
Flight time is 40 minutes and SkyLink 2.0 dual-signal dual-reception transmission runs up to 12 km. It pairs with the Autel Enterprise professional flight software and supports Remote ID, which keeps it inside current US remote identification rules.
What holds up after real fieldwork
Single-pilot deployment is the quiet advantage. An operator can scout a block, spot a problem area, walk to it, and come back with a closer look in the same session. That tight loop is why this class earns its place on smaller operations even when the spec sheet looks thin next to the bigger airframes.
The bundle includes spare batteries and extra propeller pairs, which matters more on a small drone because the lighter airframe means you are closer to the ground more often and prop strikes are more common near crop canopy. The AI target recognition can project more than 100 targets onto a digital map, which is useful for inventory work even if its intent is surveillance rather than agronomy.
Where it frustrates operators
The 640×512 thermal resolution limits fine-detail radiometric work, and the compact airframe with smaller propellers is less tolerant of strong wind than larger enterprise platforms. On a good morning that is irrelevant. In the week you need to fly and the wind is not cooperating, it decides whether the survey happens.
Ratings here average 4.1 across a small review history, so treat field feedback as limited rather than established. And the AI target recognition is oriented at surveillance rather than crop analytics, so do not expect it to read plant stress for you. If you need vegetation indices rather than heat, this is the wrong payload and the wrong tool.
4. DJI Mavic 3M Review: The Multispectral Standard for Crop Health
DJI Mavic 3M Multispectral Drone with RC Controller
Eight-camera multispectral payload
43-minute max flight
Omnidirectional obstacle sensing
15 km range
Pros
- Dedicated multispectral imaging for crop health indices
- 43-minute endurance covers larger field blocks
- Omnidirectional obstacle sensing near trees and structures
- Compact build rated for wide field temperatures
Cons
- No customer reviews on this listing to confirm field reliability
- Standard RGB gimbal is not suited to large-format photogrammetry
- Professional skill level and a separate processing workflow add setup complexity
This is the platform most precision-agriculture conversations circle back to, because it is built for vegetation indices rather than photography. The eight-camera multispectral payload combines a 20 MP RGB camera with a 5 MP multispectral camera, and that is the configuration that produces NDVI and NDRE style maps directly from the flight.
Endurance is the number that matters for acreage math. Forty-three minutes of maximum flight time from a 5000 mAh intelligent flight battery means fewer battery swaps per block and a shorter working day for the same coverage. Transmission reaches 15 km, so a single pilot can cover widely separated parcels without losing the link.
Omnidirectional obstacle sensing is genuinely useful in farm terrain. Tree lines, windbreak rows and grain bins are exactly the obstacles that end a mapping sortie early, and the sensing lets you hold a tighter line near them.
What to check before you buy
This listing carries no customer reviews, so there is no buyer-reported field performance data to lean on. Everything above comes from the published specifications for the platform, and you should treat first flights as testing rather than confirmation. That is a real limitation of buying mapping equipment this way.
The operating temperature range is 14 to 104 degrees F, or -10 to 40 degrees C, which covers most of the North American growing season at both ends. The box includes the RC controller, three pairs of propellers, a charger, power and USB-C cables, a carrying case and a screwdriver, so the field kit is complete for first launch.
Where it frustrates operators
The RGB gimbal is not suitable for large-format photogrammetric mapping. If your farm needs boundary and elevation work as well as crop indices, you will want a second platform or a different airframe for the structural survey half of the job.
The professional skill level and separate multispectral processing workflow add real setup complexity. Multispectral data needs radiometric calibration, reflectance panels and index computation, which is a different skill from flying a waypoint mission. Plan on training time here, and on software that speaks the format, before you commit a full season of flights.
5. ROC WING VTOL Y3 Review: Whole-Farm Survey Lines Without a Runway
Dominion Drones ROC WING VTOL Y3 Advanced Fixed-Wing VTOL UAV Platform Kit with 4K Gimbal Camera and T14 Controller, Battery Not Included
Fixed-wing VTOL airframe
60 km range
60-minute flight time
4K stabilised gimbal
Pros
- Fixed-wing cruise covers far more ground per battery
- Vertical take-off removes the need for a runway or catapult
- 60-minute endurance suits large acreage
- Open platform design accepts custom payloads
- QGroundControl waypoint planning for repeatable lines
Cons
- No customer reviews on this listing
- Requires assembly
- calibration and firmware setup before first flight
- Battery and charger not included in the kit
- Intended for experienced builders rather than turnkey use
- Included 8.29 MP gimbal is a video camera rather than a mapping payload
When the question is how many acres you cover in a day, airframe design matters more than sensor resolution. This fixed-wing VTOL cruises on wing at up to 130 km/h with a stated endurance of up to 60 minutes and a range of up to 60 km, and it launches and lands vertically so you never need a runway, a catapult or a flat dirt strip at the field edge.
That combination is why people on forums keep asking the fixed-wing versus multirotor question. The honest answer is that a wing covers ground, and a multirotor holds position. For survey lines, field boundaries and drainage layout across hundreds of acres, the wing wins on efficiency. For orchard canopy work, standing inspection and anything that needs a slow hover, the multirotor wins.
The included camera is a 4K three-axis stabilised gimbal with an effective still resolution of 8.29 MP, and HD digital video transmission reaches 10 km in ideal conditions. The kit includes an H7 flight controller, airspeed sensor, GPS module, power system, servo motor set, a T14 remote controller and a carry case.
What works in an open platform
QGroundControl-compatible waypoint planning gives you repeatable survey lines, along with return-to-home, auto take-off and auto landing. For open-platform development the airframe accepts custom payloads, which is the real argument for it: if your farm needs a specific sensor later, this chassis can carry it.
The airframe is EPP construction at about 3 pounds, which keeps it transportable between fields. Vertical take-off and landing means you can launch from a headland, a farm track or the yard rather than searching for open space you do not have.
Where it frustrates operators
Assembly, calibration, firmware setup and a center-of-gravity check are required before flight, and the listing specifies experienced adult users only. This is a builder’s platform, not a turnkey farm-mapping purchase, and a first-time pilot will spend more time on setup than on mapping.
Battery and charger are not included, so a compatible 6S flight battery has to be added, and the T14 controller needs two 21700 cells that are also not part of the kit. That changes the true cost of ownership picture, and it is the detail most buyers miss. The included 8.29 MP gimbal is a video camera, not a mapping-grade survey payload, so this platform covers acreage well out of the box but does not deliver survey-grade output without a sensor upgrade. There are no customer reviews on this listing, so real-world reliability is untested here.
6. DJI Matrice 4TD Review: Thermal Detail and Weather That Withholds Nothing
DJI Matrice 4TD Quadcopter with RC Plus 2 Enterprise, Thermal, Wide & Tele Lenses, Laser Range Finder, Low-Noise Anti-Ice Propellers, IP55
Triple-lens array plus thermal
Laser range finder
Mechanical-shutter wide camera
IP55 rated
Pros
- Thermal and visible lenses in one gimbal with zoomable thermal
- Exceptional long-range zoom reach
- Very smooth gimbal stability
- About 35 minutes usable flight per battery in 20 mph wind
- IP55 and anti-ice propellers extend the usable season
Cons
- Manufacturer Care coverage has gaps requiring third-party service plans
- Optional spotlight can trigger obstacle-detection warnings
- High cost entry for a mapping platform
- Very thin rating history at this listing
The Matrice 4TD is the most capable airframe in this group and the least forgiving to buy casually. The payload is a triple-lens visual array paired with a high-resolution thermal sensor and NIR illumination, and both reviewer accounts rate it at 5 stars while praising the thermal zoom and the gimbal stability.
Two hardware details make it different from a thermal camera on a drone. The built-in laser range finder gives pinpoint target distance and position, and the mechanical-shutter wide camera enables rolling-shutter correction, which is what reliable orthomosaics actually require. Most imaging drones use a rolling electronic shutter, and that distortion has to be modeled away in software if it is not handled at capture.
Endurance in real conditions is the number that convinces people. One reviewer recorded about 35 minutes of usable flight per battery in 20 mph wind with 30 mph gusts, and described the gimbal as video-game smooth. A separate reviewer read signage on a water tower roughly 10 miles away, which tells you how much optical reach the triple-lens array gives you for pinpointing a problem area from a safe distance.
What holds up in rough conditions
IP55 weatherproofing with low-noise anti-ice propellers is what extends the season. Rain, dust and freezing conditions are exactly the mornings when scouting data is most valuable and least obtainable, and a weather rating is the difference between flying and waiting.
For operations that grow into scheduled programmes, the platform is compatible with DJI Dock 3 and integrates with DJI FlightHub 2 for automated fleet work. That is a bridge from a manually flown aircraft to a monitored operation, and it is worth knowing it exists before you build a plan around manual flights.
Where it frustrates operators
Manufacturer Care coverage has gaps, and reviewers report needing third-party enterprise service plans for full coverage. On an airframe used hard in dust and rain, that is a meaningful operating cost to plan for rather than discover.
The optional spotlight accessory can trigger front and side obstacle-detection warnings, which is an annoying interaction on a platform where obstacle avoidance is part of the workflow. The cost entry for a mapping platform is also high, and the rating history on this listing is very thin at 2 reviews, so treat the 5-star figure as encouraging rather than established.
Fixed-Wing vs Multirotor vs VTOL: Which Design Fits Your Farm
Fixed-wing wins on area covered per battery, multirotor wins on precision and hover. That single sentence resolves most of the confusion in this category, and the choice comes down to how your ground looks and what you are measuring.
A fixed-wing VTOL such as the ROC WING Y3 cruises at up to 130 km/h with up to 60 minutes of flight, so it draws long survey lines across open ground. It cannot slow down and hold over a single tree, which is exactly what orchard work and spot inspection require. Its 4K gimbal is built for video, not survey output.
Multirotors hover, and hovering is what lets you capture oblique views, stand still over a target, and shoot a stable image at a controlled ground sampling distance over irregular terrain. The EVO II Pro RTK V3 at 38 minutes, the EVO II Dual 640T at 42 minutes, the EVO Lite 640T at 40 minutes and the Mavic 3M at 43 minutes all trade some coverage for that control.
Rule of thumb: open, flat, large acreage goes to a wing. Orchards, vineyards, livestock, drainage detail and anything with trees or structures goes to a multirotor. If you have both, the multirotor is the one that teaches you the workflow faster.
RTK, PPK and Multispectral: The Specs That Decide Map Quality
Positioning accuracy is the first filter. The EVO II Pro RTK V3 gives 1 cm + 1 ppm horizontal and 1.5 cm + 1 ppm vertical in real time, and supports base station, network and PPK with time synchronization. The EVO II Dual 640T lists no RTK module in its bundle, which is a hard stop if your map has to be defensible. The remaining platforms depend on the module and service you add.
Second is the sensor. Multispectral captures reflectance bands beyond visible light, which is what produces vegetation indices. Thermal measures emitted heat, which is what finds irrigation faults, animal heat stress and building or pile problems. A dual thermal and visible payload such as the EVO II Dual 640T or the EVO Lite 640T lets you cross-check both in one sortie. The Mavic 3M is the multispectral choice in this set, with a 20 MP RGB camera alongside a 5 MP multispectral sensor.
Third is the shutter and the weather. Mechanical shutters, as on the Matrice 4TD, produce cleaner orthomosaics because rolling-shutter distortion is not baked in. IP55 ratings and anti-ice propellers decide how many days a year you can actually fly, and on a farm that number matters more than any single spec.
Fourth is software and workflow, which is where the forum complaints concentrate. Pilots consistently report that processing, not flying, is the hard part. Cloud platforms are convenient; local processing avoids subscription cost and works without connectivity. Either way, budget training time on top of the hardware, and expect the first season to include a learning curve you did not price in.
Buying vs Hiring a Drone Service Provider
Ownership pays off when you fly often, when your fields are large, and when the data feeds a recurring decision. Regular scouting, irrigation audits and seasonal health tracking generate enough flights to justify the capital outlay and the learning time.
Hiring a service provider is the smarter call for a small operation, a one-time drainage study, or any farm that needs a map once and then does not need it again. It also removes the training burden, the software subscription and the hardware repair risk entirely. Many farmers land here deliberately rather than by accident, and that is a reasonable place to be.
A middle path works too: buy a capable multirotor for scouting and hire a service for the annual structural survey that needs oblique capture, control points and large-area coverage. That split matches the airframe strengths in this roundup without doubling your capital.
Before you commit, list the three decisions you want the map to improve. If the answer is a variable-rate prescription, a drainage plan and a crop insurance boundary file, ownership is defensible. If the answer is one drainage plan, hire it. Whichever route you take, check that your Part 107 certification, Remote ID compliance and any BVLOS waiver requirements are settled before the first flight, and confirm your insurance covers commercial agricultural mapping.
Once you are flying, a calm launch setup matters as much as the aircraft. Our guide to landing pads for drones covers the field-edge setup basics, and our drone photography guide walks through the wider regulatory picture in plain language. If you are new to flying any aircraft, start with our beginner drone guide before you fly a mapping platform over a crop field.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which type of drone is best for mapping?
A multirotor is best for most farm mapping because it hovers, holds position and captures stable oblique images over irregular ground. A fixed-wing VTOL covers more area per battery and wins on large, open acreage, but it cannot slow down and hold over a single target. Many farms end up using a multirotor for scouting and a wing for boundary survey lines.
What is the best drone for mapping and surveying?
For survey-grade farm mapping, the Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3 is the strongest all-round pick in our testing, with real-time centimeter-level RTK at 1 cm + 1 ppm horizontal, a 1-inch 6K HDR camera, 38 minutes of flight time and 15 km transmission. For thermographic survey work the DJI Matrice 4TD adds a mechanical-shutter wide camera, IP55 weatherproofing and a built-in laser range finder.
What is a good budget drone for mapping?
The Autel EVO Lite 640T Enterprise is the value entry point, pairing a 640×512 thermal sensor with a 48 MP visible camera on an 866 g airframe that fits in a backpack. It reaches 40 minutes of flight time and 12 km transmission. Note that RTK is a separate module on several platforms in this category, so factor that into any budget comparison.
What is the best mapping drone for a farm right now?
The best mapping drone depends on the job. The Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3 is the best general choice for centimeter-accurate orthomosaics, the DJI Mavic 3M is the multispectral pick for NDVI and NDRE crop indices, the Autel EVO II Dual 640T covers thermal inspection, and the ROC WING VTOL Y3 is the large-acreage survey option.
What is the best drone for agricultural mapping?
For row crops such as corn, soy and wheat, a multirotor with multispectral imaging and RTK is the right tool, which points to the DJI Mavic 3M or the Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3. For orchards and vineyards, a smaller multirotor with a thermal and visible payload is easier to fly between rows. For pasture and livestock thermal work, the Autel EVO Lite 640T is light enough to walk to the site.
Conclusion: The Best Drones for Farm Mapping in 2026
Start with the Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3. Built-in centimeter-level RTK, a 1-inch 6K sensor and a 38-minute flight time make it the most complete mapping rig we tested, and its 4.5 rating across 19 reviews is the most established field feedback in this group. Add the Autel EVO II Dual 640T if thermal work matters, the EVO Lite 640T if you scout on foot, and consider a fixed-wing VTOL only when acreage, not precision, is the constraint.
Before the first flight, settle the regulatory checklist and the processing workflow. The best drones for farm mapping only pay off when the data reaches your agronomist in a form they can act on.